Customer Reviews for VEVOR Chain Link Fence Gate, 81 x 117 cm, Adjustable Chain Link Fence Panel, Fit 67-183 cm (W) x 122 cm (H) Garden Fence Gate Opening, Rust-Resistant Galvanized Fencing Gate for Farm Posts Not Included
Galvanized 81 x 117 cm
Customer Reviews
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
Our overall rating is not a simple average. We prioritize authentic, trustworthy reviews and filter out duplicates or invalid content before calculating the final score. This helps ensure the rating truly reflects real customer experiences.
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a Review
82 Reviews
Reviews for Current Item
Verified Purchase
Photos and video only
Wow! Just wow...
Galvanized 183 x 178 cm
When I bought this adjustable chain link fence I just couldn't believe my luck! Fits 91cm to 122cm? Exactly what I needed!
Shame it's not adjustable, not does it fit between 91cm and 122cm.
Shame that arranging some type of return is not doable where I live.
Shame I was obviously ripped off by ambiguous description (or outright false advertising)
Shame I have actively told and shared every single person I can about this.
Shame on Vevor.com
Rip offs.
Buyer beware.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk/review.
4 people found this helpful
You Get What You Pay For
Galvanized 183 x 122 cm
I normally don't leave reviews but I was very disapointed in the quality of this gate. The frame and cable itself was nice and decent quality, but the chainlink part is very cheap. Not only was the chainlink not cut the same but it wasn't even attached together at the top and the bottom. I am glad to hear others had a great product but mine was not. If I hadn't already put the frame together and cable part I would've sent it back for another one. I would highly encourage you to pre assemble your frame and then put your chainlink on top of it to make sure it was cut correctly.
0 people found this helpful